The Communication Decency Act: The Fight For Freedom of Speech on the Internet :: essays research papers

The Communication Decency Act The Fight For Freedom of voice communication on the profits     The Communication Decency Act is a aviator which has insulted our decline asAmerican citizens. It a bill which SHOULD non pass. Ill sh ar with you howInternet users are reacting to this bill, and why they say it isunconstitutional.     Some individuals disagree with one circumstances of the bill. According tohttp//thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ query/z?c104s.652.enr, which has theCommunications Decency Act on-line for humankind viewing, "Whoever uses anInternet service to send to a person or persons nether 18 years of develop......anycomment, request, suggestion, proposal, image,........or anything offensive asmeasured by modern-day community standards, sexual or excretory activities ororgans.....shall be fined $250,000 if the person(s) is/are under 18.......imprisoned not more than two years.......or both."     The wordi ng of that character seems sensible. However, if this one littleparagraph is approved, many sites such as the genus Venus de Milo site located athttp//www.paris.org/Musees/Louvre/Treasures/gifs/venusdemilo.gif the SistineChapel athttp//www.oir.ucf.edu/wm/paint/auth/michelangelo/michelangelo.creation andMichelangelos David http//fileroom.aaup.uic.edu/FileRoom/images/image201.gifcould not be accessed and used by anybody under the age of 18. These works ofart and many other museum pictures would not be available. The bill says thesesites show indecent pictures.     The next part of the CDA has everybody in a double legal fit. We, concernedInternet users, took the writers of this bill to court, and we won.     This part of the bill states "Whoever....makes, creates, orsolicits...........any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or othercommunication which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or indecent.......withintent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or rile another person......by means of anInternet page..........shall be fined $250,000 under title 18......imprisonednot more than two years....or both......"     The writer of that paragraph of the bill forgot something. It violatesthe constitution. The First Amendment states " sexual relation shall make nolaw....prohibiting or abridging the freedom of speech......the right of the plurality peaceably to assemble.....and to petition the Government.............."     This bill does exactly that. It says we cannot express our feelingscleanly. I understand that what may be of interest to me, may be offensive toothers. Many people put up warning signs on their websites stating, "This sitemay take in offensive material. If you are easily offended you may not extremity tocome here." If the writers of this bill would have listed that as a requirement on that point would have been no trouble.   & nbsp Here is the way I look at it. I think that some things should becensored on the Internet. nestling pornography, for instance, is already illegal,so it follows that it should also be illegal on the Internet. Besides,psychologically, it modify the children involved.     Something else that should be banned from the Internet are "hacker"